Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 14 post(s) |

Gossamer DT
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
36
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:42:00 -
[1] - Quote
Andski wrote:I agree. If you disagree with this nerf, unsub now! and don't come back
can I haz your titan when you unsub? |

Gossamer DT
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
36
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
Quest Liem wrote:I believe in it is a definite imbalance if one group can field more people then the other. We play this game to be fair and have fun, how fun is it to be outnumbered 50 to 1? Not very, in the best interest of this game CCP should come up with a way to limit the number of combatants in a signal system. I mean we do need to be fair and give someone s sporting chance.
what? even sided fights? is your sandbox full of catnip by chance? |

Gossamer DT
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
36
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:58:00 -
[3] - Quote
Quest Liem wrote:Scooter McCabe wrote:Quest Liem wrote:I believe in it is a definite imbalance if one group can field more people then the other. We play this game to be fair and have fun, how fun is it to be outnumbered 50 to 1? Not very, in the best interest of this game CCP should come up with a way to limit the number of combatants in a signal system. I mean we do need to be fair and give someone s sporting chance. So you want to penalize alliances that have a better culture in terms of attracting players and getting them to show up for fleet fights. Sorry CCP cannot upgrade your personality. How is that penalizing any alliance? We are making the game more enjoyable for both. You enjoy the game by out numbering your opponent? Is not that not an I win button? I am bring issues that would make the game more fair to everyone who pays to play the game. A 30 on 30 fight is a lot more enjoyable then something like 300 on 50. Do you not agree?
I think you are looking for hi sec and war dec's we are tearing about titans in this thread, can you go find a lets be even sided fights thread some where else? TIA |

Gossamer DT
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
36
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:05:00 -
[4] - Quote
Quest Liem wrote:Gossamer DT wrote:Quest Liem wrote:Scooter McCabe wrote:Quest Liem wrote:I believe in it is a definite imbalance if one group can field more people then the other. We play this game to be fair and have fun, how fun is it to be outnumbered 50 to 1? Not very, in the best interest of this game CCP should come up with a way to limit the number of combatants in a signal system. I mean we do need to be fair and give someone s sporting chance. So you want to penalize alliances that have a better culture in terms of attracting players and getting them to show up for fleet fights. Sorry CCP cannot upgrade your personality. How is that penalizing any alliance? We are making the game more enjoyable for both. You enjoy the game by out numbering your opponent? Is not that not an I win button? I am bring issues that would make the game more fair to everyone who pays to play the game. A 30 on 30 fight is a lot more enjoyable then something like 300 on 50. Do you not agree? I think you are looking for hi sec and war dec's we are tearing about titans in this thread, can you go find a lets be even sided fights thread some where else? TIA Oh im sorry, the other 80 plus pages of worth while post were all about titans. But thank you for proving my point, in your lack of a decent reply. it seems that other people can blob titans and its not fair but its ok if we blob sub capitals in EVE. Nice one side argument
Who is your main, and what does he do? |

Gossamer DT
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
36
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:11:00 -
[5] - Quote
GeneralDisturbed wrote:FeLiZk wrote:GeneralDisturbed wrote:It is refreshing to see at least one titan blobber willing to come in and admit that they saw a pretty good subcap fight in progress and thought "Man we should just drop supers all over that". You know, risk/reward or whatever. If there is a tactical structure we are in defending or attacking, and it looks like there is a chance we will lose it off cause we have. Just like you bring another full fleet. I don't recall off hand a time where we have not been outnumbered, where we have brought Titans to a straight up fight. So what you're saying is, if there's a chance you'll lose a strategic objective, you drop titans. So you win. Sort of like an "Iwin" button you might say. Huh.
I think they are getting confused becase of the I, try this "iWin" instead of "Iwin", makes apple look pretty sharp. |
|
|